Friday, May 20, 2011

MacKay MyHero




So recently in class we have begun reading David JC MacKay's Without Hot Air, a book, if you will, provided to educate the consumer instead of imposing the author's beliefs on the reader. Coming from the book we read at the beginning of the term, Blessed Unrest by Paul Hawken, this book is much less emotional. MacKay uses facts and provides the reader the information need to facilitate the reader to make their own decision; Hawken writes about what he is passionate about and what he believes in. For a person like me who would rather do long division than be forced to be creative, MacKay is much more my style. But it is my belief that both authors need to exist, because not everyone learns or critically thinks in the same fashion. Some people really found Blessed Unrest interesting and informative, where as I hated it, and it was the least favorite part of my week. But both of these books need to exist for people to become educated on what is/has happen(ing/ed) in this world and what they can do to help and prevent things like this in the future. While I like math because everything has a correct answer, some people like to express their feelings, and leave things to interpretation; this is how these two authors differ. I just want to clarify something before I wrap this up: I would still recommend Blessed Unrest to someone, it just depends on who it is and their style.

2 comments:

  1. I completely agree with you in that both authors cater to different styles. For such an important movement we need writers and speakers like Mackay and Hawken that different people can relate to and therefore better understand what it is that is happening.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found it difficult to read MacKay because of all the mathematical figures, graphs, and such. It honestly makes my head hurt! I don't really have the head for those sorts of things, so Hawken was more my style. I am a very emotional, thought oriented person. Facts and figures speak to my more logical, realistic side, but that was all Mackay seemed to have. I guess that was the point of reading both, so we could really see both sides of the story and gain a better understanding of why we are in such hot water when it comes to the environment.

    ReplyDelete